May 5 Public Board Meeting — Prep Brief
Session: 11 Date of meeting: May 5, 2026, 7 PM EST (Zoom) Attendance: Optional — but if the developer attends, use this brief Format: Public board meeting, likely Q&A opportunity after formal session
Why this matters
The Luther, MI site is new. No LoF attendee has camped on it at full-scale. The org's board meetings are public and often include Q&A with organizers who have been actively planning the event.
This is a low-effort way to get answers to specific questions that cannot be found in any published source yet.
Pre-meeting prep (5 minutes)
- Download Zoom link from volunteer.lakesoffire.org or the org's announcement
- Have these questions written down; don't rely on remembering them
- Keep questions short and specific — board meetings are not one-on-one planning sessions
- If there's a Q&A queue, submit questions in the chat when given the opportunity
Priority questions (site and logistics)
These are the questions that would directly update playbook documents:
1. Site map and campsite release timeline
"When do you expect to release the site map for the Luther property? Is there anything published about campsite zones yet?"
Why: SITE-arrival-new-luther-MI.md and COMMS-group-connectivity-plan.md both have placeholders that depend on the site map. Knowing the timeline helps the group plan the June–July review.
2. Water access — second well status
"We saw that a second well was being drilled for the Luther site. Is that on track, and will there be on-site water distribution available in open camping areas?"
Why: The current water plan is 45 gallons group total (bring your own). If on-site distribution is confirmed for open camping, the group's water carry requirement changes significantly. This directly affects Matt's procurement list.
3. Open camping terrain — any site restrictions
"For open camping areas, are there zones being reserved away from the creek or swamp areas? Any areas attendees should avoid for camping?"
Why: SITE-arrival-new-luther-MI.md currently recommends avoiding low-lying and swamp-adjacent areas as a general principle. An org-level restriction would make this a rule, not just a guideline. Campsite selection on arrival should be informed by this.
4. Fire safety — open flame rules for new site
"Are there any changes to fire rules for the Luther site compared to past years — particularly for ground-level campfires or fire art?"
Why: The current plan is propane-only (no campfires in open camping). If the org has adjusted fire rules for this site, that changes nothing about the group's plan — but good to confirm.
Secondary questions (nice to know)
Ask only if there's time and the Q&A is open-ended:
5. Cell coverage expectations
"Has anyone from the team been out to the Luther site recently? Any sense of what cell coverage is like in the camping areas?"
Why: The COMMS plan is built around zero-tech fallback because cell is expected to be unreliable. If coverage turns out to be reasonable, the plan still works — but it's useful to know.
6. Generator rules
"What are the generator rules for open camping this year?"
Why: The group resolved this (solar + battery only, no generator), but confirming generator rules in context of the new site is a low-cost verification.
What to do with answers
| If you learn: | Update: |
|---|---|
| Site map release date | SITE-arrival-new-luther-MI.md + next-session.md |
| On-site water confirmed | PACKING-framework.md, INFRA-checklist-core-systems.md, next-session.md (Matt's water procurement adjusts) |
| Campsite zone restrictions | SITE-arrival-new-luther-MI.md |
| Changed fire rules | CAMP-OPS-minimum-viable-model.md |
| Cell coverage info | COMMS-group-connectivity-plan.md |
Write a short log entry in research/ after the meeting with whatever you heard. Even "nothing new" is useful to record.
If you don't attend
The meeting is optional. If the developer doesn't attend:
- Check LoF social channels or forum for meeting recaps after May 5
- If the org posts minutes or a recording, scan for site map and water distribution announcements
- No action required if nothing significant changes
Decision memo
- Keep: Attending as a developer-only action; no need to involve Matt or Amber in a Zoom meeting
- Prioritize: Water distribution and site map questions — these directly unblock playbook updates
- Reject: Using the meeting to ask general first-timer questions — this is a public board meeting, not orientation; keep questions infrastructure-specific
- Standardize: Any answers that change planning → log in research/ and update the relevant playbook file immediately
- Revisit: If the org posts a site map in June–July, trigger a focused playbook update session (campsite selection notes, COMMS meeting point confirmation)